Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Proactive Thinking: Circle of Influence vs. Circle of Concern

As I was thinking about this post, I checked my news sites. From Arts & Letters Daily, I stumbled onto an article by Richard Perle about what really went wrong with W's policies. On a day that is historic, this got me thinking about the entire message of change that evidently catapulted a senator to become President Barak Obama - and what is likely to happen if the status quo isn't challenged.

Being proactive requires looking at what you can actually do something about, not with things you can't influence (at least at present). So let's think: what can we control/influence? I look at my life, and I see a collection which includes the following items:
  • chores
  • scheduling
  • my health (via exercise, nutrition, and yoga)
  • my writing
  • actions
  • thoughts/feelings
  • work duties
I might only have a small area that I can directly or indirectly influence, especially on the job, but by focusing there I can do a lot - and potentially earn greater trust and responsibilities. Issues that top the list of "immediate interest" include money (to pay the bills and build savings), having a job, meeting people, and building a writing career. Within each area, I look for specific steps to take to reach my goals or solve the problems at hand. The key is looking for steps that will make progress.

When we push a lever, we expect it to be connected to some particular machinery. Perle's article made me think of some important questions:
  1. Who do we think is in charge of what?
  2. What do we think they can do in their position?
  3. Who do we think is in their way?
  4. How accurate are our assumptions?
Regardless of your opinion of W, these are important concerns. If there are more obsticles to making anything happen than we realize, then a new method is called for - and not necessarily a new person in the position. The idea is to (try to) determine what is within a particular office's Circle of Influence and what is in the Circle of Concern - which is problematic without considerable research, but not impossible. Also, why overburden any one office? That makes everything take longer.

The challenge is to find small, local-level steps to solving any problem (no matter the scale), and do them yourself. Or organize a group effort - locally. Be willing to brainstorm ideas, get information out, and making even a slightly bigger effort than before. By the end of this year, imagine what might be possible by taking little steps every day...

Thursday, January 15, 2009

Habit 1: Be Proactive - Who makes things happen?

With the new year and new administration, I see a lot of people who assume that the new president will make a lot of changes happen. Question is, what are the underlying assumptions? That others are responsible for making things "better" than they currently are? What about our own actions? Why can't we do something ourselves instead of waiting on the perpetually slow government?

I started this blog because I was sick of hearing how this candidate or that candidate was going to be the answer to our troubles. It sounded like nobody wanted to take things into their own hands. Why not let many ideas be trotted out, and see what happens? Some solutions will make more sense for one area than another, so why limit ourselves to a one-size-fits-all package pushed on us by someone who can't possibly know the specifics of our local zone?

Studying proactivity in general fit with my tendencies toward libertarian ideals, and I had to consider what being proactive means as far as responsible liberty is concerned. If we are happiest by actively creating our destiny and making our own choices, then what about doing things bit-by-bit on a local level? I feel that assuming that voting for a candidate will make a difference seems a little too distant to make sure anything happens. It's actually out in the Circle of Concern, that which we cannot control or influence.

I worry about the state of homeschooling - how it gets treated legally, what the public knows about it, and what could be done to make things better. Yes, I can support national organizations and pay attention to legal proceedings, but what about helping on a local level? There are homeschool groups I could give time and money to, and I could directly help some families. I can - and I suspect I will - write about my own experiences with homeschooling and what I know about how people can make it happen. Getting that information out, and making sure that it's as polished as possible, is a proactive action, and withing my Circle of Influence - that which I can directly or indirectly work on.

If there's something we're passionate about, then why not look for something locally based to do to make a difference? Help one or two local families, and perhaps let the information get out if you know writers. Making the environment better? Volunteer for local clean-up efforts, and organize extra ones. If creating work experience for college students is important to you, organizing volunteer efforts that generate work/study opportunities may open all kinds of doors for students. It may also help get improvement projects done sooner, if you can get people to help with the work.

Being proactive means taking action to transform problems into opportunities to exercise creative muscle. If every citizen took some small action locally on a particular problem (say, education), what kind of effect would it have on the state or even national situation? Things happen faster and at lower cost than if the changes are directed from the top - from the government levels. All I'm suggesting is that we look outside of the box to make change possible, and make this year better than any year before. Waiting on our elected officials has been the M.O. of this country for decades, and we're all concerned about government messing our lives. How about a paradigm change?

Also, why let others - especially ones we're not comfortable with - dictate our feelings or actions? That's giving them power over us. It's not empowering. Instead, we're encouraged to be dependent on a "parent figure" who doesn't encourage us to become independent. It's a bigger, stronger state of mind and living. It does take courage to take on the responsibility of running our own lives, and not everyone can do it to the same extent. But I hate being made to pay for the mistakes of others - especially when they are the only ones hurt by their own actions.

Where is the fairness in that? How much is wasted by that situation? Think of a few situations, and make some estimates. And think of things that you could do to change that. If nothing else, you exercise your imagination. That's always worth an effort.

Wednesday, January 7, 2009

Upcoming posts

With the new year and all of the energy and commotion buzzing in the air, I thought that my posts needed a new focus. I found it in my study of The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People, which I began late last year. (Wow, it's really 2009 already...) While I am immersing myself in the Habits, I will share my observations on how they apply to Responsible Liberty.

This is the theme of all of my blogs for this year, but the exact observations are different for each topic. Still, similar ideas will appear across the board. And all will start with Habit 1: Be Proactive. My first post on it will appear as soon as I am satisfied with what I've written.